Back to Market Signals
Market Signal: Military Rotorcraft

Who supplies the MH-139A Grey Wolf? Inside the Boeing–Leonardo production model

Published October 2, 2026 / MH-139A Grey Wolf supply chain

The U.S. Air Force has placed its first full-rate production order for the MH-139A Grey Wolf.

The latest award covers four helicopters, taking the total under contract to 42. Boeing has delivered 27 aircraft so far, while the Air Force's current program of record covers 56.

Boeing is the prime contractor, but the MH-139A is based on Leonardo's commercial AW139.

Leonardo manufactures the base helicopter at its facility in northeast Philadelphia before Boeing installs the military-specific equipment at its Ridley Park operation.

4

aircraft in the first full-rate lot

The latest Air Force production award

42

MH-139As under contract

Boeing has delivered 27 aircraft

56

aircraft in the program of record

The current Air Force objective

One aircraft, two connected production operations

The commercial AW139 base aircraft and its U.S. military configuration

Base aircraft

Leonardo

Builds the commercial AW139 at its northeast Philadelphia facility.

Military configuration

Boeing

Installs the military-specific equipment at Ridley Park, Pennsylvania.

Where the first-tier subcontract value flowed

Positive first-tier subcontract obligations beneath Boeing's main award, FY2021–FY2025

Mimir identifies 68 first-tier supplier sites and approximately $416 million in mapped subcontract obligations beneath Boeing's main MH-139A award.

68
identified first-tier supplier sites
~$416M
mapped subcontract obligations
~84%
through two Leonardo operations
AgustaWestland Philadelphia 74%
10%
Other 16%

Leonardo's Samarate operation represented the additional approximately 10%.

Together, the two Leonardo operations accounted for approximately $350 million.

The military modification and support network

Selected first-tier supplier positions identified in the Mimir records

The remaining value was distributed across the military modification, mission-equipment and support network. Supplier positions included:

Pinnacle Solutions

Huntsville, Alabama

Aerospace support

Mimir records identify an aerospace-support position beneath Boeing's main MH-139A award.

Teledyne FLIR

Wilsonville, Oregon

Electro-optical/infrared system

Teledyne FLIR supplies the existing Star SAFIRE 380HDc EO/IR system fitted to the aircraft.

BAE Systems

Greenlawn, New York and Austin, Texas

Mapped systems and avionics activity

BAE Systems operations in Greenlawn and Austin appear in first-tier records associated with the program.

Northrop Grumman

Northridge, California

Mapped systems activity

The Northridge operation appears as a specialist first-tier systems position beneath Boeing.

Integris Composites

Hebron, Ohio

Ballistic armor

Integris produces the ballistic armor incorporated into the MH-139A Grey Wolf.

Teledyne FLIR supplies the aircraft's existing Star SAFIRE 380HDc electro-optical/infrared system, although the Air Force is currently evaluating an upgrade to the EO/IR capability. Integris produces the Grey Wolf's ballistic armor.

A commercial-derivative production model

Most of the first-tier value beneath Boeing flowed to Leonardo for the underlying AW139 platform, with the remaining network supporting military-specific systems, modification and support activity.

The subcontract data therefore reflects the MH-139A's commercial-derivative production model.

Full-rate production will scale both parts of that model: Leonardo's AW139 manufacturing base and the suppliers supporting Boeing's military configuration of the aircraft.

Sources and notes

Boeing full-rate production announcement, Boeing MH-139A program information, FY2027 Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System, Teledyne FLIR supplier announcement, Air Force MH-139A EO/IR upgrade notice, Integris Composites supplier announcement, USAspending, FPDS and Mimir Data Platform and Modeling.

Mimir analysis of positive first-tier subcontract obligations under Boeing's main MH-139A award FA873918C5030, FY2021–FY2025. Supplier sites are defined by CAGE where available and by supplier name and location where a CAGE was unavailable. Figures are rounded. The records describe historical mapped subcontract activity and are not a confirmed supplier list for the newly awarded full-rate production lot.

Continue the research

Explore the next question with Ask Mimir

Continue the analysis
View all signals
Explore the underlying market

Mimir research tools

Privacy at Mimir

We use first-party product analytics to improve Mimir. You can opt out or choose campaign measurement.