Back to Market Signals
Market Signal: Defense Market Insight

Prime obligations are rising. Incumbents are capturing the growth.

Published July 21, 2026 / FY2021-FY2025 prime contract activity

Defense prime obligations rose by about 25% between FY2021 and FY2025.

But the number of distinct suppliers* receiving this money fell by nearly 10%.

+25%

prime obligations, FY2021-FY2025

-10%

distinct supplier CAGEs with positive obligations

$99B

increase from CAGEs present in FY2021 and FY2025

>90%

prime obligations captured by CAGEs active all five years

Prime obligations
+25%
FY2021$397B
FY2025$494B

Net obligations to identified CAGEs.

Active supplier entities
-10%
FY202144.0K
FY202539.8K

Decline in distinct CAGEs with positive obligations.

Supplier change by annual obligations received

All net decline is below $1M; the $10M+ tier grew.

This entire decline occurred on the lower end of the supplier base, in suppliers receiving less than $1M in obligations per year. Meanwhile, the number of suppliers receiving more than $10M annually grew.

$10M+
+320
$1M-$10M
flat
$100K-$1M
-1.2K
$10K-$100K
-2.8K
Under $10K
-680
$10M+ tier
$100B

increase in positive obligations.

Persistent suppliers captured nearly all five-year obligations

Supplier CAGE persistence, FY2021-FY2025

The additional money flowed overwhelmingly to established suppliers. Supplier entities active throughout all five years captured more than 90% of prime obligations.

Supplier CAGEs74,446 total
35.1%
37.4%
27.5%
Positive obligationsFY2021-FY2025
6.7%
92.4%
Active 1 year Active 2-4 years Active all 5 years
Suppliers active in FY2021 and FY2025 accounted for a $99B increase.

Largest parent increases

Top three: $58B increase

At the parent level, the growth had clear destinations: Lockheed Martin, RTX and General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin
$34B
RTX
$12B
General Dynamics
$12B

Largest product increases

Top three: $51B increase

By product category, the largest increases were concentrated in ships, aircraft and missiles.

Combat ships
$21B
Fixed-wing aircraft
$18B
Guided missiles
$12B

What the signal says

01

More spending did not necessarily mean a broader supplier base.

Defense prime obligations rose by about 25%, while the number of distinct CAGEs receiving this money fell by nearly 10%.

02

The decline occurred at the lower end.

The net decline came from CAGEs receiving less than $1M in obligations per year, while the number receiving more than $10M annually grew.

03

The growth reinforced incumbents.

Supplier entities active throughout all five years captured more than 90% of prime obligations.

Notes

*Distinct supplier entity = CAGE code receiving positive prime contract obligations in the fiscal year. CAGE refers to the Commercial and Government Entity code used to identify supplier entities and sites.

Sources: USAspending, FPDS, DLA, Mimir Data Platform and Modeling. Figures rounded; percentage changes calculated from unrounded values.

Continue the research

Explore the next question with Ask Mimir

Continue the analysis
View all signals
Explore the underlying market

Mimir research tools

Privacy at Mimir

We use first-party product analytics to improve Mimir. You can opt out or choose campaign measurement.