Back to Market Signals
Market Signal: Defense Market Insight

Prime obligations are rising. Incumbents are capturing the growth.

Published July 21, 2026 / FY2021-FY2025 prime contract activity

Defense prime obligations rose by about 25% between FY2021 and FY2025.

But the number of distinct suppliers* receiving this money fell by nearly 10%.

+25%

prime obligations, FY2021-FY2025

-10%

distinct supplier CAGEs with positive obligations

$99B

increase from CAGEs present in FY2021 and FY2025

>90%

prime obligations captured by CAGEs active all five years

Prime obligations
+25%
FY2021$397B
FY2025$494B

Net obligations to identified CAGEs.

Active supplier entities
-10%
FY202144.0K
FY202539.8K

Decline in distinct CAGEs with positive obligations.

Supplier change by annual obligations received

All net decline is below $1M; the $10M+ tier grew.

This entire decline occurred on the lower end of the supplier base, in suppliers receiving less than $1M in obligations per year. Meanwhile, the number of suppliers receiving more than $10M annually grew.

$10M+
+320
$1M-$10M
flat
$100K-$1M
-1.2K
$10K-$100K
-2.8K
Under $10K
-680
$10M+ tier
$100B

increase in positive obligations.

Persistent suppliers captured nearly all five-year obligations

Supplier CAGE persistence, FY2021-FY2025

The additional money flowed overwhelmingly to established suppliers. Supplier entities active throughout all five years captured more than 90% of prime obligations.

Supplier CAGEs74,446 total
35.1%
37.4%
27.5%
Positive obligationsFY2021-FY2025
6.7%
92.4%
Active 1 year Active 2-4 years Active all 5 years
Suppliers active in FY2021 and FY2025 accounted for a $99B increase.

Largest parent increases

Top three: $58B increase

At the parent level, the growth had clear destinations: Lockheed Martin, RTX and General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin
$34B
RTX
$12B
General Dynamics
$12B

Largest product increases

Top three: $51B increase

By product category, the largest increases were concentrated in ships, aircraft and missiles.

Combat ships
$21B
Fixed-wing aircraft
$18B
Guided missiles
$12B

What the signal says

01

More spending did not necessarily mean a broader supplier base.

Defense prime obligations rose by about 25%, while the number of distinct CAGEs receiving this money fell by nearly 10%.

02

The decline occurred at the lower end.

The net decline came from CAGEs receiving less than $1M in obligations per year, while the number receiving more than $10M annually grew.

03

The growth reinforced incumbents.

Supplier entities active throughout all five years captured more than 90% of prime obligations.

Notes

*Distinct supplier entity = CAGE code receiving positive prime contract obligations in the fiscal year. CAGE refers to the Commercial and Government Entity code used to identify supplier entities and sites.

Sources: USAspending, FPDS, DLA, Mimir Data Platform and Modeling. Figures rounded; percentage changes calculated from unrounded values.